Maybury DNA Project Update
January 2024
This is the first update on the Maybury DNA Project to appear on Mayburyfamily.com. The last project report published at <homepages.rootsweb.com/~mabry/> was in 2018. Since then, project updates have been published on the FamilyTreeDNA project public website https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/maybury/about
Updates published on this site will aim to include more discussion of results than can appear on the FTDNA public website.
To see Maybury Y-DNA test results.
Go to https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/maybury/about
Y-DNA data can be accessed on the Maybury DNA Project public website via the left-hand menu box ‘DNA Results’. Only members who have opted in to ‘sharing’ can access their results on this site. Members' STR results are summarised on two chart types. Members are assigned to subgroups, based on their genetic, genealogical or geographic information. Subgroups may change as new data comes to hand. The charts also identify members’ haplogroups or branches on the paternal tree of humankind. These are usually a major branch, eg. R-M269, most Mayburys’ branch. Those members who have tested with BigY will have a more precise haplogroup shown, identified by a SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism), eg. R-BY74532. The chart Group Time Tree shows how particular branches of the Maybury family have emerged. The chart shows only those members who have tested with BigY and have opted in to ‘sharing’. The chart is updated every week.
Who are our members?
The Maybury DNA Project currently has about 240 members. The project is primarily a Y-DNA project, meaning that it traces ancestry along the male line. So, participants in the project should be male with a variant of the Maybury surname. Unlike some DNA Projects, we do not follow an exclusive membership policy. Some of our members bear other surnames but are genetically related to Mayburys. This is of interest to us because it sheds light on past Maybury relationships and genealogy.
About 70% of all Maybury-surnamed participants in the Maybury DNA Project are considered to be descendants of John Maybury of Sussex (c.1540-1618), an English ironworker. It would appear that these Mayburys all share a mutation in their DNA - the SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) R-BY13824. The next largest group in the Project are the descendants of Frederick Mayberry of Bedford County, Virginia (d.1801). They are unrelated to the R-BY13824 Mayburys and appear to carry the SNP R-Y82850.
The next largest group of Mayburys are believed to be descendants of Randolf and Oran Aaron Mabrey. Randolph Mabrey was possibly a son of Cornelius3, Charles2. Randolph may have had as many as nine sons of his own. We believe that the four participants tested so far all descend from one of those sons, Oran Aaron Mabrey. Thus, it is possible that Oran Aaron was either adopted into the Mabrey family or born out of wedlock to a Mabrey female. Whether or not this "non-matching" DNA signature extends back to Randolph Mabrey cannot be determined until we can test others who descend from one of Oran Aaron's brothers (Don Collins 2018). Another similar sized group of Mayburys has been termed ‘Affinis Pennsylvania Mayberry’ due to reported genealogical and geographic links to Pennsylvania - one member has been identified as haplogroup R-SS5750.
There are three other small family groups and a larger group of individuals bearing variants of the Maybury surname, but not related genetically to the R-BY13824 or other Mayburys. Either by way of non-paternal events or name changes these essentially represent new Maybury families
What have we learned since 2018?
When Don Collins launched the Maybury DNA Project in 2003, the available Y-DNA tests examined only 12 markers or locations on a chromosome – Y12 STR tests – but Y25, Y37, Y67 and then Y111 tests became available later. The Maybury DNA Project has the results from all of these tests in its database, although FTDNA now offers only Y37 and Y111 tests. In 2016, the results from the first BigY test were obtained, providing Y111 results and the identification of SNP mutations. BigY testing accelerated by the 2020s and began to reveal the broad picture of Maybury family relationships.
BigY testing shows that, on present information, most Maybury Project members are positive for the SNP R-BY13824, regarded as John Maybury of Sussex’s haplogroup. Following John, three main family branches emerged among his descendants. These are identified by the SNPs R-FT379334, R-FTA43422 and R-FTA84209. Coincidentally, John Maybury produced three sons who are known to have, in turn, produced sons: Nicholas Maybury (c.1567-1634), Clement Maybury (1575-after 1628) and John Maybury of Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire, England (1577-1651). A convincing case has been made for John Maybury of Cleobury Mortimer to be the progenitor of the R-FTA84209 family branch, thanks to the genealogical research into the Maybery family of Gloucestershire and Australia. Significant gaps in historical documents relating to Nicholas and Clement Maybury have made the identification of the progenitors of the other two family branches difficult.
Nevertheless, there are indications that the mutation R-FT379334 is associated with Nicholas Maybury. In 2011, Don Collins proposed the theory that Richard Mayberry (m.1626/27; d.1643) of Churchtown (Cartmel), Lancashire (now Cumbria), was a son of Nicholas Maybury based on naming patterns in his children. Richard’s son, John Mayberry (1628-1677) migrated to Kilrea, Co. Londonderry in Ireland’s north in c.1657 and is known to have had at least one son, Richard Mayberry of Lisnagrot, and either a son or grandson, William Mayberry (c.1688-1764/65). William married Bathsheba Dennis in 1714 and subsequently migrated to America, settling in Windham, Massachusetts (later Maine). A small community of Mayberrys became established in Co. Londonderry and Co. Antrim near Kilrea in the following centuries. This region seems to have had a concentration of R-FT379334 Mayburys: a descendant of William Mayberry of Windham has tested positive for R-FT379334 as have two descendants of Alexander Mayberry, who lived around Lisnagrot in the late 18th century, and a descendant of a Mayberry family who migrated from Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland, to Canada.
A Maybury from western Co. Cork, in the south of Ireland has also tested R-FT379334. His ancestry has only been traced back to the 1840s. However, there is a history of Mayburys living in the west Cork region with the earliest record dating back to 1620 when a Maybury arrived in Bandon with a party of tradesmen. This is very early and might indicate that a son of John Maybury of Sussex’s eldest son, Nicholas, may have relocated to Ireland. Far more documentary research needs to be done on Mayburys in this area.
What has strengthened the case for regarding R-FT379334 Mayburys as descendants of Nicholas Maybury has been the results of recent research into the R-FTA43422 branch of the Mayburys that strongly suggest that its progenitor was Clement Maybury.
Descendants of Francis Maybury (d.1712) of Surry County, Virginia; descendants of the Mayburys and Mayberrys of Co. Kerry, Ireland; and a Mayberry with ancestral links to the Bucks Co. Pennsylvania and Hunterdon Co. New Jersey have all tested positive for R-FTA43422. The Mayburys/Mabrys of Virginia and the Mayburys/Mayberrys of Kerry are very closely related - the modal DNA haplotypes for 103 STR markers are identical for Kerry and Virginian Mayburys except for three sites.
Even more telling is that both the Virginian and Kerry families had Francis Mayburys conducting themselves on separate sides of the Atlantic around the 1670s: Francis Maybury (d.1712) of Surry County and Francis Mayberry, hammerman of Glanarought, Kerry, and Enniscorthy, Wexford. They were contemporaries, estimated to have been born roughly around the 1640-50s and dying around 1710. It is likely that they shared a grandfather. It is also likely that the hammerman Francis Mayberry had a father, Thomas Maybury, recorded as the probable master of his team of hammermen – such teams were typically composed of related individuals.
This pointed to the two Francis Mayburys having, as their grandfather and common ancestor, Clement Maybury, who incidentally had a son Thomas Maybury, baptised 10 July 1621 at Wednesbury in Staffordshire.
Unfortunately, the identity of Francis Maybury of Surry County’s father is still elusive. Clement Maybury had another known son, Edward (1609-1665) but it seems that this given name was not carried on to Francis’ descendants (nor was it popular among the Kerry Mayburys). It is very possible that Clement had other children whose names are not to be found in surviving records.
These findings have largely been the result of a collective effort by descendants of the Mayburys of County Kerry in the past few years that has seen a substantial uptake or upgrading to BigY. Not only was this cluster established as R-FTA43422, but a good number of Y111 STR results was obtained across the various Kerry families. This enabled a more detailed analysis of STR data than was previously possible and, combined with extensive sharing of family trees by members, has produced valuable insights into the relationships of Maybury family groups in Kerry. However, as has been seen above, these insights had implications beyond Kerry and, thanks to members of the Mabry family in the US testing with BigY, led to the identification of the probable ancestors and relationships of Francis Maybury of Surry Co. Virginia. One never knows what impact work conducted on one Maybury family will have on our understanding of other Maybury families.
New Maybury Project Co-administrator.
We are pleased to have been joined by David McConnell as a new Maybury Project Co-administrator. David is a Fellow Emeritus at the Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin. His family have connections to the Maybury family of Muckross, Killarney, through the marriage of Isabella Maybury (b.1838) to James Dagge in 1853. David will assist with DNA analysis.
Things you can do to help.
Upgrading to BigY at FTDNA is encouraged. It provides the best information to assist members in establishing their places in the Maybury family. It is cost-effective, providing both SNP and Y111 STR results.
Please SHARE: The Maybury DNA Project works best when members work together. If Sharing options are not enabled, members will not be able to review their results on the Project website and it can inhibit the information that can be included in reports such as this. Individual details are always restricted to surname and kit number to ensure privacy. See FTDNA: Accounts Settings>Project Preferences> Group Project Profile.
Family trees are vital. Brickwalls and other genealogical issues are best solved by the use of all available evidence – DNA can’t stand alone. If members lodge their Maybury family trees in their FTDNA accounts, it will assist Project administrators in their efforts to reconstruct Maybury family lines and address enquiries. If members encounter difficulties in entering their family trees in their FTDNA accounts, they can contact the Maybury DNA Project administrator.